I found a good comparison here: Some of it is pretty subjective, but you can more easily compare features and decide which would be more important to you. As long as Cricut doesn’t try to re-introduce their after-the-fact subscription model, you’ll likely have success with either one, so I’d factor in things like Cameo’s larger cutting area/mat-free cutting, Maker’s wide range of tool options (meaning more material options), and so on. Silhouette just tends to be more of a word-of-mouth brand. As such, more people have them, but that’s not a reflection of quality. One thing to keep in mind, Cricut is a heavily marketed brand. It does have more consistency in terms of where you start cutting than the other machines I’ve used, but I got rid of it and just kept my Cameo. I have not used a Cricut Maker (yet), so I can’t compare at that level, but I do think that the Maker might be more versatile in terms of materials.įWIW I don’t love the Curio - it has too many parts and it’s fiddly. The Cameo is just a really consistent machine and the Print & Cut works well, although it does waste some material. I also really like Silhouette’s software and sometimes use it for GF design. I have owned 2-3 machines from each brand and prefer the Silhouette Cameo in terms of reliability and business model.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |